SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.3 número2Variabilidad genética de la colección del germoplasma de cañahua (Chenopodium pallidicaule Aellen) de BoliviaEl Isaño (Tropaeolum tuberosum) un cultivo de consumo y medicina tradicional en Huatacana para el beneficio de la población boliviana. índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

    Links relacionados

    • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO
    • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

    Bookmark

    Revista de Investigación e Innovación Agropecuaria y de Recursos Naturales

    versão impressa ISSN 2409-1618

    Resumo

    COARITE, Mario et al. Grain loss of Cañahua before and after physiological maturity (Chenopodium pallidicaule Aellen). RIIARn [online]. 2016, vol.3, n.2, pp. 134-145. ISSN 2409-1618.

    Cañahua is considered important in the diet, compared to other Andean crops and products that Bolivia produces; besides it offers characteristics of great value, such us tolerance to low temperatures and above all that the grains are saponin-free. However, its main problem during the production is the loss of grains, which shows that it is a species in process of domestication. This research was conducted in Villa Patarani Community. Loss of grains per plant was determined before physiological maturity (pre-harvest) using collectors and/or traps for collecting fallen grains. Also grain loss during harvest (after physiological maturity) was determined and compared between three harvest methods: hand picking, sickle and pruning shears, and between six cultivars sowed in two different dates. Before physiological maturity, the date of sowing influenced the loss of grains. The loss of grains was greater in the first date (2.91%) than in the second (1.36%). Regarding harvesting methods, the method of picking had greater grain loss (2.60%), followed by the sickle method (1.67%) and the harvest with pruning shears (1.53%) which was the method with lowest loss of grains. Despite this last result, this method is not widely used by producers. During harvest, the cultivars Illimani and Kullaca showed higher grain losses (2.31 and 2.17%), whereas Umacutama cultivar showed lower losses (1.96%). During harvest, the cultivars Illimani and Kullaca had higher grain losses of 2.31 and 2.17%, while in Umacutama the loss was lower (1.96%).

    Palavras-chave : Cañahua; grain loss; food security; Center Altiplano.

            · resumo em espanhol     · texto em espanhol     · pdf em espanhol